Rumble's Small Creator Partnership Program kicks off its second round today. This time, the creators get fancy graphics for their channels and a spot on the homepage that rotates every 15 minutes(https://rumble.com/small-creator-partners). Nice touches, sure, but how much more can be added to the homepage?

While Round 2 creators bask in their 30 day homepage glory, the rest of the us are pondering the sustainability of such selective generosity. Why not invest in a system that rewards all creators based on clear, attainable goals?

I've laid out a vision for a tiered progression system that could offer a more long-term solution, supporting creators based on their actual contributions to the platform. This approach would give every creator a fair shot at recognition and reward, not just the handpicked few.

Check out my proposal here: https://whatupian.locals.com/post/5241650/rethinking-rumbles-approach-to-creator-partnership.

So, as Round 2 rolls out with its exclusive graphics package and homepage features, let's not forget the bigger picture. It's time for Rumble to rethink its approach and consider a future where all creators can thrive.

Here is a list of all 111(yes, more than 100 for some reason) creators that got into the program:

https://rumble.com/small-creator-partners

As Rumble announces the latest batch of creators accepted into the second round of its Small Creator Partnership Program, the community is a mixture of excitement and disappointment. This selective program, while beneficial for the chosen few, raises questions about its fairness and sustainability. With only 100 slots for an ever-growing pool of talent, many dedicated creators are left wondering about their place on the platform.

The Drawbacks of Selectivity in Partnership Programs

Selective programs inherently create a divide between those who are accepted and those who are not, which can be discouraging for many creators. This method of selection, while intended to foster high-quality content, may inadvertently sideline talented individuals who simply haven't been noticed. It begs the question: Is there a better way to encourage and support content creation on Rumble?

My Suggestion for a Tiered Growth and Rewards Program

Rumble has mentioned that it is revamping the whole backend dashboard. This update presents an ideal moment for Rumble to redefine how it supports and acknowledges its creators, my suggestion is through the non-revolutionary idea of a tiered recognition system. Rumble already distinguishes itself from platforms like Twitch and YouTube by offering immediate access to a full suite of monetization tools right from the start.

Tiered Recognition Levels

The cornerstone of the proposed tiered recognition system for Rumble lies in its transparent, metric-based progression criteria. By ensuring that the metrics determining tier advancement are visible and understandable to users, creators are equipped with clear goals to strive towards. This visibility not only paves the path to greater recognition and rewards but also empowers creators by making their objectives tangible and attainable. It is not revolutionary. It doesn't need to be.

My proposed tiered system would begin with:

• Contender Tier: Available to all Rumble users from the outset, pretty much what is currently in place. It includes access to live streaming, Rumble Rants (donations), a standard ad revenue split (60/40%), and paid subscribers. This approach ensures every creator has the tools they need for growth, engagement, and monetization, setting a solid groundwork for their content creation journey.

Moving up, the system would include:

• Champion Tier: For creators who have made a significant impact through consistent content and growing engagement, live and non-live content. This tier is a recognition of their established presence and influence on Rumble. 

• Legend Tier: The apex of Rumble’s creator community, reserved for those who have reached the pinnacle of success and influence on the platform. Being part of this tier is a testament to a creator's exceptional achievement and contribution.

Rewards and Benefits

• Ad Revenue Share: Creators will receive revenue share model that increases with each tier, incentivizing content creation and audience engagement.

• Platform Visibility: Higher-tier creators receive enhanced visibility through featured content spots and priority placement, broadening their reach across the Rumble audience.

• Exclusive Opportunities: Access to exclusive events, Rumble on-site Studio, and direct support from Rumble, varying by tier to provide resources that are tailored to each level of creator achievement.

The Key is to Make a Clear Path to Growth!

This brings us back to the current juncture with the Rumble Partnership Round 2. Where do we go from here? Is there are round 3... round 4... round 5? I hope not. Ideally, the experiences from the first two rounds will inform Rumble's long-term approach to creator partnerships. Continuously selecting small creators isn't a viable long-term strategy.

While the Small Creator Partnership Program - Round 2 may provide valuable opportunities for some, a tier-based system as outlined would offer a scalable way to support and reward creators. By focusing on clear, achievable metrics, Rumble can ensure that every creator has the opportunity to succeed based on their effort and talent, fostering a more vibrant and dynamic community where every creator has the chance to grow.

Note: To some I may not be a "streamer" because I am not currently streaming on Rumble, but my goal has never been to stream a million times a week. My goal is to stay up-to-date on what Rumble is doing and provide my commentary. That maybe a stream every now and then, but it will also be articles like this or simple tweets that start converstions. So you can listen or don't, I'll be alright either way. But I do appreciate those that do. Thank you and let me know what you think in the comments.

For the past couple of years, I've been eyeing the Nintendo Switch, even missing out on some great titles like the new Mario Wonder and Zelda. Yet, I've held off on making the purchase. Now, with the rumors going around of the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2, it seems my patience might be rewarded. Reports from Bloomberg and insights from analyst Hiroshi Hayase at Omdia point towards an exciting release in 2024.

The Nintendo Switch 2 is rumored to feature an 8-inch screen, a significant increase from the current model(6.2-inch). This larger screen could enhance the gaming experience, making the wait for the new model a potentially wise decision. Sharp Corp’s involvement in providing LCD panels for the console is an interesting choice, especially considering the popularity of the OLED model. This decision suggests that Nintendo is prioritizing the size and cost of an LCD screen over the quality of an OLED screen.

In terms of market positioning, the choice of an 8-inch screen places the Nintendo Switch 2 in a competitive spot. While the ROG Ally has adopted a 7-inch display and Legion Go has explored an 8.8-inch screen, Nintendo's selection offers a balance between size and portability.

The internal hardware of the Nintendo Switch 2 remains largely under wraps. Speculation about NVIDIA supplying advanced chips with features like DLSS and ray-tracing adds to the anticipation but remains unconfirmed.

For those like me, who have been contemplating the current Nintendo Switch, the prospect of the Switch 2 presents a compelling reason to wait. The potential improvements in screen size and technology promise a more immersive gaming experience, which could be worth the wait.

As more details about the Nintendo Switch 2 emerge, I'll be keeping a close eye on developments. This next iteration of Nintendo's console could very well be the upgrade that some of us have been waiting for.

What would you like to see from a "Next Gen" Nintendo?